This poem is about the broken dreams of a couple who have lived in an unjust society. This poem is not about race it is about an old couple's humanity and everyday actions. Do you think Brooks is writing a poem about race? Why or why not?.How does your reading of the couple's race color your reading of the poem? Use specific textual examples to describe your reaction.Cummings and Wallace Stevens (collected poems). According to Brooks, she was on a panel of three judges for the Pulitzer in 1955, where the contending finalists were, if I remember correctly, E.E. In 1989, I was in a workshop with Gwendolyn Brooks when a student brought up Wallace Stevens. Why do you think Brooks signals the couple's skin color in the first line of the poem? Is the placement of this information important? A twist to this story (that you may have already heard).
So even if this poem isn't explicitly about race, it's completely shadowed by America's racial history. When she was writing in the 1960s, poverty rates among blacks were ridiculously higher than the poverty rate among whites. Gwendolyn Brooks's work, however, is known for its deft exposure of the ways that a person's race or class can affect his or her social standing. We must say, it's a little presumptuous for us to decide that race is one of the central topics of 'The Bean Eaters.' After all, the couples' skin color is only mentioned once – and even then, it's part of a larger description.
